The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) is a federal law designed to protect employees aged 40 and older from discrimination in the workplace. This law ensures that older employees are not unfairly treated when it comes to various aspects of employment, including hiring, promotions, firing, layoffs, benefits, and compensation. Under the ADEA, employers are prohibited from making employment decisions based on age, ensuring that older workers have the same rights and opportunities as their younger counterparts.
Employers must be careful not to make assumptions based solely on age, and they must ensure that their policies and practices are job-related and do not disproportionately affect older employees. This law addresses the need for fairness in a way that considers both the experiences and challenges unique to older workers, ensuring that they are treated with dignity and respect in the workplace. While younger workers may be seen as more malleable or adaptable, older workers are often subject to stereotypes about being less innovative, slower, or less capable of adapting to new technologies. These assumptions can lead to biases when hiring or promoting, despite older workers having decades of experience that younger employees may not possess.
Disparate Treatment and Age
Disparate treatment under the ADEA can happen when an employer treats an older employee differently because of their age or assumptions about their abilities. This can include decisions regarding promotions, job assignments, or even terminations. For example, older workers might face bias in the way they are assigned responsibilities, training opportunities, or treated in comparison to younger employees.
Examples of Age Discrimination include:
A qualified employee over 40 is passed over for a promotion in favor of a younger, less-qualified candidate.
An older employee is routinely assigned less desirable tasks or is excluded from team meetings while younger employees receive better opportunities.
Employees over 40 are consistently denied access to training opportunities that could advance their career, while younger employees receive these opportunities.
An employee over 40 is the subject of unwarranted criticism or micromanagement that damages their performance and morale.
HARASSMENT
Another common form of unfair treatment under the ADEA is hostile work environment harassment, where age-related comments, actions, or behaviors create an atmosphere that is intimidating, hostile, or offensive. To be legally actionable, harassment must be sufficiently severe or frequent to interfere with the employee’s ability to do their job.
Examples of Harassment related to age include:
Frequent age-related insults, derogatory comments, jokes, or ridicule that belittle an employee based on their age.
A supervisor or coworker repeatedly mocks an older employee’s skills or refers to them as “outdated” or “too old for the job.”
Displaying offensive age-related symbols or posters in the workplace that create an uncomfortable environment.
Technology and Age Discrimination:
Adapting to a Changing Workplace
Unlike race, color, religion, sex, and national origin—which are immutable characteristics that do not change over time—age is a characteristic that naturally evolves. As individuals age, the likelihood of discrimination can increase.
A common issue in today’s workplace is the perception that older employees struggle to keep pace with the fast-evolving, technology-driven environment. Employers may use an employee’s perceived difficulty in adapting to new technology as justification for adverse actions, such as being passed over for promotions or having their responsibilities reduced.
As with all forms of discrimination, the core issue often lies in unfair assumptions. While some older workers may need to focus on acquiring new technical skills, this is true for employees of any age.
Communication tools like Teams, Slack, and cloud sharing have become integral to business operations. Employees who are less familiar with these tools may, in certain circumstances, be unfairly judged as less capable in these vital areas. To mitigate this, it is important for older employees to proactively request any necessary training and to continue to follow up until they receive it. Failing to provide adequate training can be a powerful argument against claims that the employee was deficient in these essential skills.
Disparate Impact and Age
The ADEA also recognizes that discrimination can occur even when a policy does not mention age at all. This is known as “disparate impact” — when an employer applies a rule or practice that seems neutral but disproportionately harms workers aged 40 and older. These policies may not be intended to discriminate, but they can still have a negative effect on older workers in practice. While the law allows for these types of claims, courts apply a narrower standard than in other discrimination cases and proving a violation can be more difficult.
Damages and Remedies
While the ADEA offers protection for employees who face age-based discrimination, its remedies are more limited compared to other anti-discrimination laws. Under the ADEA, employees who prevail in discrimination or harassment cases may be entitled to recover back pay, front pay, and attorney's fees and costs. These remedies can be substantial, especially when discrimination has persisted over time. However, the ADEA primarily focuses on making the employee whole by recovering lost wages due to discriminatory actions. The statute does not include compensation for emotional distress or pain and suffering, nor does it allow for punitive damages. These types of remedies, however, are available under many state and local anti-discrimination laws, which can offer broader protections and additional compensation.
Important Note About State and Local LaW
While the ADEA provides protections for employees aged 40 and older, many state and local laws offer broader protections. These laws not only extend to smaller employers but also apply to workers as young as 18, meaning both younger and older employees are safeguarded against age-based discrimination. Similar to claims made by employees over 40, younger employees may file discrimination claims when they are unfairly passed over for opportunities, fired, or treated differently based on their age, with the key difference being that the discrimination is based on being too young rather than too old.
proving your case:
Knowing your rights and gathering evidence. Learn More
Anti-Retaliation Protections:
Reporting violations without fear. The law protects you. Learn More
independent contractors:
Employee or Contractor? Misclassification Matters. Learn More